Discrimination or Social Networks? Industrial Investment in Colonial India
Bishnupriya Gupta
The Journal of Economic History, 2014, vol. 74, issue 1, 141-168
Abstract:
Industrial investment in colonial India was segregated by the export industries, such as tea and jute that relied on British firms and the import substituting cotton textile industry that was dominated by Indian firms. Empirical evidence in this article does not suggest that barriers to entry faced by Indian entrepreneurs created this separation. Informational asymmetry played an important role. British entrepreneurs knew the export markets and the Indian entrepreneurs were familiar with local markets. Conditional on the initial advantage in entry, social network effects determined subsequent entry of firms by ethnicity and created separate spheres of industrial investment.
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Discrimination or Social Networks? Industrial Investment in Colonial India (2013) 
Working Paper: Discrimination or Social Networks? Industrial Investment in Colonial India (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jechis:v:74:y:2014:i:01:p:141-168_00
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The Journal of Economic History from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().