The Centenary of Marx and Mill

V. W. Bladen

The Journal of Economic History, 1948, vol. 8, issue S1, 32-41

Abstract: In looking back over a hundred years to John Stuart Mill's Principles of Political Economy and to the Communist Manifesto, joint product of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, it is difficult not to be influenced by the stereotypes of “bourgeois” and “Marxian” economists that have developed in the process of doctrinal controversy. (It is sometimes as difficult to recognize the “orthodox” economist from the description of the “Marxian” as it is to recognize the “classical” economist from the description of the “Keynesian.”) But the difficulty does not lie simply in the probability that adherents of each school will caricature the leaders of the other, emphasizing contrasts; there is an equal probability that the modern adherents of each school will caricature their founders, emphasizing points that have come to be important. The “historical” Marx and Mill have to be sought with the special care that arises from an awareness of these difficulties.

Date: 1948
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jechis:v:8:y:1948:i:s1:p:32-41_09

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The Journal of Economic History from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().