The cultural architecture of failure: reintegration, stigma, and the long-run conditions of entrepreneurial dynamism

Gurpreet Chatwal

Journal of Institutional Economics, 2026, vol. 22, e41

Abstract: Institutional economics holds that informal institutions shape which formal rules communities adopt and how those rules work, yet it has not specified which informal institutions govern which outcomes. This paper identifies one, cultural reintegration architecture: the mechanism by which a community judges the failure of an economic actor and opens or closes the path to commercial standing. Its four observable elements, narrative scripts, moral attribution, ceremonial pathways, and community acceptance, locate a community on a spectrum from stigmatising to reintegrative. Six historical cases spanning eight centuries, Venice, the Hanseatic League, Meiji Japan, the Nattukottai Chettiar, the nineteenth-century United States, and Silicon Valley, ground three claims: the architecture is a structural variable separable from formal institutions, it conditions long-run entrepreneurial dynamism, and it shifts over time. The account specifies a mechanism within the informal-institutional space that North, Greif, and Putnam jointly occupy, grounded in the older institutionalism of Veblen and Commons.

Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/ ... type/journal_article link to article abstract page (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:22:y:2026:i::p:e41_41

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Institutional Economics from Cambridge University Press Cambridge University Press, UPH, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 8BS UK.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk Stebbing ().