 Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second "YES"Livia Sz. Oláh
Demographic Research, 2011, vol. 24, issue 9, 217-224 Abstract: This paper is based on my contribution to a debate, organized by MPIDR, on the question displayed in the title above. I was asked to present arguments for the "yes"-response (together with Laurent Toulemon, and arguing against the "no"-side represented by Gerda Neyer and Dimiter Philipov). As pointed out in the paper, the most important theoretical reasoning relevant for this question is the gender equity theory. A number of studies provide sound empirical support to it, as discussed in the paper in details, and thereby also a rationale for a positive impact of increased gender equality on fertility. As the dual-earner family is here to stay, and given the well-known negative consequences of long-term very low fertility for a society, pushing for gender equality seems to be a reasonable strategy to be considered aiming for sustainable societal development. Keywords: fertility; gender equality; second births; gender roles; parental leave; division of household work; dual-earner couples; fertility desires (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:24:y:2011:i:9 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.