EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Traditional versus Facebook-based surveys: Evaluation of biases in self-reported demographic and psychometric information

Kyriaki Kalimeri, Alessandro Rosina, Andrea Bonanomi, Mariano G. Beiró and Ciro Cattuto
Additional contact information
Kyriaki Kalimeri: ISI Foundation
Alessandro Rosina: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Andrea Bonanomi: Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Mariano G. Beiró: Universidad de Buenos Aires
Ciro Cattuto: ISI Foundation

Demographic Research, 2020, vol. 42, issue 5, 133-148

Abstract: Background: Social media in scientific research offers a unique digital observatory of human behaviours and hence great opportunities to conduct research at large scale, answering complex sociodemographic questions. We focus on the identification and assessment of biases in social-media-administered surveys. Objective: This study aims to shed light on population, self-selection, and behavioural biases, empirically comparing the consistency between self-reported information collected traditionally versus social-media-administered questionnaires, including demographic and psychometric attributes. Methods: We engaged a demographically representative cohort of young adults in Italy (approximately 4,000 participants) in taking a traditionally administered online survey and then, after one year, we invited them to use our ad hoc Facebook application (988 accepted) where they filled in part of the initial survey. We assess the statistically significant differences indicating population, self-selection, and behavioural biases due to the different context in which the questionnaire is administered. Results: Our findings suggest that surveys administered on Facebook do not exhibit major biases with respect to traditionally administered surveys in terms of neither demographics nor personality traits. Loyalty, authority, and social binding values were higher in the Facebook platform, probably due to the platform’s intrinsic social character. Conclusions: We conclude that Facebook apps are valid research tools for administering demographic and psychometric surveys, provided that the entailed biases are taken into consideration. Contribution: We contribute to the characterisation of Facebook apps as a valid scientific tool to administer demographic and psychometric surveys, and to the assessment of population, self-selection, and behavioural biases in the collected data.

Keywords: demography; survey; bias; social media; psychometrics; Facebook; self-selection bias; recruitment bias; self-reporting bias; personality; moral foundations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol42/5/42-5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:42:y:2020:i:5

DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2020.42.5

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:42:y:2020:i:5