Migration, daily commuting, or second residence? The role of location-specific capital and distance to workplace in regional mobility decisions
Thomas Skora,
Heiko Rüger and
Knut Petzold
Additional contact information
Thomas Skora: Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften
Heiko Rüger: Bundesinstitut für Bevölkerungsforschung (BiB)
Knut Petzold: Hochschule Zittau/Görlitz
Demographic Research, 2024, vol. 50, issue 33, 967-1004
Abstract:
Background: If a new job is located in a different region from the place of residence, individuals or households can choose between moving or commuting. However, so far mobility alternatives and their drivers remain under-researched from a comparative perspective. Objective: We investigate the determinants of the mobility choices of individuals who have taken a distant job (50 km or more), considering three options, (1) permanent migration, (2) daily commuting, (3) weekly commuting (i.e., a second residence), thereby focusing on the interplay between migration costs linked to different sources of location-specific capital (property ownership, working partner, school-age children) and transition costs linked to the distance travelled. Methods: We use longitudinal data from the German Socio-economic Panel (SOEP, 2001–2019) and estimate probit regression models with Heckman correction to account for sample selection. Results: We find that a large distance to the workplace favors the decision to migrate or to commute weekly, while a high endowment with location-specific capital favors daily or weekly commuting. Weekly commuting is particularly chosen when both migration and transition costs are very high. However, parents of school-age children are more inclined to commute daily, suggesting that they are often more willing to accept high transition costs than to be separated from their family during the week. Contribution: This study is one of the first to differentiate between daily and weekly commuting in a comparative analysis of mobility determinants. It complements previous findings by relying on a precise measure of spatial distance and examining real mobility behavior instead of self-reported mobility intentions.
Keywords: spatial mobility; regional mobility; migration; commuting; Sozio-oekonomisches Panel (SOEP); location-specific capital; multilocality; second residence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol50/33/50-33.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:33
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.33
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().