The pitfalls and benefits of using administrative data for internal migration research: An evaluation of Australia’s Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA)

Aude Bernard, Tom Wilson, Anthony Kimpton, Neil Argent, Tomasz Zając and Jing Wu
Additional contact information
Aude Bernard: University of Queensland
Tom Wilson: Independent researcher
Anthony Kimpton: University of Southern Queensland
Neil Argent: University of New England
Tomasz Zając: University of Queensland
Jing Wu: University of Queensland

Demographic Research, 2024, vol. 51, issue 22, 687-722

Abstract: Background: To enhance its data capability, Australia recently set up a longitudinal administrative micro-dataset, the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA). Objective: To ensure that users in both scholarly and applied settings understand how PLIDA can be reliably used, we assess its Combined Location Module, which provides place of residence by combining three administrative datasets since 2006. Methods: Using descriptive statistics and regression analysis, we compare the population coverage of PLIDA to the census, estimate the incidence of missing values at various spatial scales, quantify spatial mismatch between PLIDA and the census, and compare the intensity, selectivity, and spatial patterns of internal migration between the two datasets. Results: The PLIDA population is higher than the census population, but very remote populations and recently arrived and temporary migrants are under-represented. We uncover a high mismatch rate between PLIDA and the census for small spatial units, particularly among highly mobile groups. As a result, PLIDA overestimates the level of internal migration and slightly distorts migration age patterns at young ages. Migration patterns are broadly comparable at large spatial scales, except for rapidly growing peri-urban regions, inner cities with short-term residents, and regions with a seasonal or temporary workforce. Conclusions: PLIDA can be used in some applied settings outside demography if the spatial scale of analysis is aggregated, the analysis is restricted to census respondents, or the analysis is limited to well-represented groups. However, in its current form PLIDA is not suitable for demographic applications such as internal migration estimates, and we discourage its use for population projections. Contribution: Researchers need to be aware of the pitfalls of administrative data to knowingly decide on appropriate use. We recommend researchers to keep abreast of developments by the Australia Bureau of Statistics, which is continuously improving PLIDA.

Keywords: internal migration; administrative data; Australia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol51/22/51-22.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:22

DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.22

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().