Interrogating the quality and completion of mortality mobile phone interviews conducted in Malawi during COVID-19: An examination of interviewer–respondent interactions

Emmanuel Souza, Funny Muthema, Georges Reniers, Stephane Helleringer, Monica Jamali, Michael Chasukwa, Julio Romero-Prieto, Jethro Banda, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Jacob Saikolo and Boniface Dulani
Additional contact information
Emmanuel Souza: University of Malawi
Funny Muthema: Institute of Public Opinion and Research, Zomba
Georges Reniers: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Stephane Helleringer: New York University, Abu Dhabi
Monica Jamali: University of Malawi
Michael Chasukwa: University of Malawi
Julio Romero-Prieto: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Jethro Banda: Malawi Epidemiological and Intervention Research Unit
Malebogo Tlhajoane: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Jacob Saikolo: Institute of Public Opinion and Research, Zomba
Boniface Dulani: University of Malawi

Demographic Research, 2024, vol. 51, issue 46, 1471-1490

Abstract: Background: Mobile phone surveys (MPSs) have gained traction as a tool for gathering survey data, especially following the emergency of COVID-19. However, our understanding of MPS data quality in contexts with limited mobile phone penetration is still modest. Objective: This study evaluates (1) the circumstances under which mobile phone survey interviews were conducted and how these might influence the completion and quality of interviews, and (2) whether mortality-related questions upset respondents. Methods: We present descriptive statistics on respondents’ locations and a few debriefing questions, complemented by an analysis of audio recordings from a selection of interviews. Results: Findings indicate that interviews conducted while respondents are in public places are more likely to be interrupted or take longer compared to interviews conducted when respondents are at home. Furthermore, mortality questions only rarely trigger emotional distress among respondents. We observed no discernible shifts in respondents’ tone when answering mortality questions relative to other questions. Conclusions: It is less desirable to conduct MPS interviews when respondents are in public places, especially on topics that require privacy. Additionally, although sensitive, mortality questions should be treated like any other, as they are largely not as upsetting as commonly perceived. Contribution: As MPSs continue to gain ground in low- and middle-income countries, establishing good practices related to the circumstances wherein respondents take interviews is crucial. Aside from being sensitive and respectful when asking survey questions, enumerators should treat mortality questions like any other. Only in a few instances do these questions typically trigger negative emotional reactions.

Keywords: Malawi; mortality; LMICs; mobile phone survey; RaMMPS; audio-recording (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol51/46/51-46.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:46

DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.46

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().