Gender disparities in death registration during the COVID-19 pandemic in an urban African setting

Orsola Torrisi, Ane Fisker, Amabelia Rodrigues, Stéphane Helleringer, Sabine Margarete Damerow and Didier Abdel Fernandes
Additional contact information
Orsola Torrisi: McGill University
Ane Fisker: Syddansk Universitet
Amabelia Rodrigues: Projecto de Saúde Bandim
Stéphane Helleringer: New York University, Abu Dhabi
Sabine Margarete Damerow: Syddansk Universitet
Didier Abdel Fernandes: Projecto de Saúde Bandim

Demographic Research, 2025, vol. 53, issue 32, 1045-1062

Abstract: Background: In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), the completeness of death registration is lower among women, hampering accurate monitoring of health and mortality, gender equality, and rights. Objective: We quantify the gender gap in death registration and examine its determinants in Guinea-Bissau, a data-scarce West African context during 2020–2023, a period of potentially high mortality. Methods: We collected survey data from 477 urban households where deaths had occurred among regular members since January 2020. We describe the characteristics and circumstances of these deaths. We then use logistic regressions to evaluate which factors are related to the likelihood of death registration. We apply Fairlie decomposition techniques to assess how much compositional factors explain the observed gender gap in death registration. Finally, we analyse reported reasons for (non-)registration. Results: Of 610 reported deaths, only 24% were registered; no infant deaths were registered. Among adult deaths (ages 15+), registration rates were higher for men (44.7%) than for women (22.1%). Gender differences in education among adult decedents explained more than 60% of the gap. Post-mortem financial transfers motivated registering male deaths, whereas non-registration was linked to low perceived benefits and limited awareness of the registration process, regardless of gender. Conclusions: The observed under-registration of female deaths has implications for accurately representing and understanding gender-specific mortality and health trends. Low completeness can increase vulnerabilities for surviving relatives lacking death certificates, which are often needed to claim rights. Addressing knowledge barriers and introducing gender-sensitive incentives could help improve coverage and reduce gender disparities. Contribution: Findings offer insights into a neglected dimension of gender inequality: its correlates and drivers in LMICs.

Keywords: Africa; CRVS systems; death registration; gender; COVID-19; low-and-middle-income countries; Guinea-Bissau (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J1 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol53/32/53-32.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dem:demres:v:53:y:2025:i:32

DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2025.53.32

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Demographic Research from Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial Office ().