EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Which Lag Length Selection Criteria Should We Employ?

Venus Liew ()

Economics Bulletin, 2004, vol. 3, issue 33, 1-9

Abstract: Estimating the lag length of autoregressive process for a time series is a crucial econometric exercise in most economic studies. This study attempts to provide helpfully guidelines regarding the use of lag length selection criteria in determining the autoregressive lag length. The most interesting finding of this study is that Akaike's information criterion (AIC) and final prediction error (FPE) are superior than the other criteria under study in the case of small sample (60 observations and below), in the manners that they minimize the chance of under estimation while maximizing the chance of recovering the true lag length. One immediate econometric implication of this study is that as most economic sample data can seldom be considered “large” in size, AIC and FPE are recommended for the estimation the autoregressive lag length.

JEL-codes: C2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-09-17
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (77) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2004/Volume3/EB-04C20021A.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-04c20021

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().

 
Page updated 2019-03-31
Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-04c20021