EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Income taxation, child-rearing policies, fertility and unemployment

Luca Gori (luca.gori@unipi.it) and Luciano Fanti

Economics Bulletin, 2007, vol. 10, issue 19, 1-10

Abstract: We examine how subsidy policies to support child-rearing of households affect the fertility rate in a textbook OLG model extended to account for a labour market imperfection (e.g., a minimum wage or a monopolistic union's wage) as well as endogenous fertility. It is shown that increasing the child subsidy actually reduces population growth. The policy implications for countries with imperfect labour markets and low fertility (e.g., the most part of European Union countries) are noteworthy: if the government''s objective is to increase the fertility rate, a child-subsidy support policy should not be introduced at all. Contrary to conventional wisdom, our findings in fact reveal that, for any given value of the minimum (or union''s) wage, the introduction of a child subsidy reduces capital accumulation and increases unemployment in the long-run, and ultimately it negatively affects the demand for children in spite of a reduced cost of child-rearing.

Keywords: Fertility; Childcare; Policies; Unemployment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H2 J1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-12-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2007/Volume10/EB-07J10004A.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07j10004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley (j.p.conley@vanderbilt.edu).

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07j10004