EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Atemporal non-expected utility preferences, dynamic consistency and consequentialism

André Lapied () and Pascal Toquebeuf

Economics Bulletin, 2010, vol. 30, issue 2, 1661-1669

Abstract: This note studies conditions which allow to maintain a non-expected utility representation (Max-min expected utility and Choquet expected utility), dynamic consistency and consequentialism in an atemporal and purely subjective framework. By contrast with a dynamic set-up, where consistency can be reached with non-expected utility models, we show that both Maxmin expected utility and Choquet expected utility degenerate into an expected utility representation.

Keywords: Non-expected utility; Choquet expected utility; Max-min expected utility; Dynamic consistency; Consequentialism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-06-19
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2010/Volume30/EB-10-V30-I2-P152.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00175

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-09-00175