Do pro-employment public policies matter?

Asma Raies ()
Additional contact information
Asma Raies: URED, FSEG, University of Sfax (Tunisia) / TEAM Paris 1 Sorbonne (France)

Economics Bulletin, 2012, vol. 32, issue 3, 2442-2452

Abstract: Theoretical and empirical studies addressing the effectiveness issue of the wage subsidy scheme are somewhat non-concluding. This paper attempts to contribute to the recent litterature of the field by studying the effectiveness of wage subsidies and by comparing their consequences with those associated with capital investment subsidies program. We develop a neoclassical model with Romer (1990)'s variety expansion framework in which we include employees' human capital. We find that the wage subsidy has no effect on the employment rate. This arises because the positive incitation effect of the subsidy is entirely compensated by the negative distortion effect of the tax exerted on human capital investment. Furthermore, a subsidy on capital goods purchased by final firms is likely to be effective in raising equilibrium employment rate provided that the relative contribution of capital goods to production exceeds the one of human capital.

Keywords: Unemployment; human capital investment; subsides on labour wage; subsides on firms' purchased capital goods. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H5 J2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-09-05
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2012/Volume32/EB-12-V32-I3-P235.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00618

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().