Low acceptance rates, commercial publishing, and the future of scholarly communication

John Conley

Economics Bulletin, 2012, vol. 32, issue 4, A37

Abstract: This letter calls attention a recent trend in economics publishing that seems to have slipped under the radar: large increases in submissions rates across a wide range of economics journals and steeply declining acceptance rates as a consequence. It is argued that this is bad for scholarly communication, bad for economics as a science, and imposes significant and wasteful costs on editors, referees, authors, and especially young people trying to establish themselves in the profession. It is further argued that the new "Big Deal" business model used by commercial publishers is primarily responsible for this situation. Finally, it is argued that this represents a compelling reason to take advantage of new technologies to take control of certifying and distributing research away from commercial publishers and return it to scholarly community.

Keywords: Publishing; Scholarly Communication; Open Access; Big Deal; Fractional Reserve; Money (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A0 A1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-11-15
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/pubs/EB/2012/Volume32/EB-12-V32-I4-A37.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00810

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley (j.p.conley@vanderbilt.edu).