Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: a meta-analysis application exploring the determinants of the time for publication acceptance
Romain Crastes () and
Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu ()
Additional contact information
Romain Crastes: Unité AGRITERR Esitpa / University of Rouen
Economics Bulletin, 2014, vol. 34, issue 3, 1575-1599
Abstract:
In this paper, we test whether the time it takes for a submitted paper to be accepted by the editor(s) is sensitive to the stated preference method used. Two methods are considered: the Contingent Valuation (CV) and the Choice Experiments (CE). A meta-analysis based on a sample of 129 papers published in Resource and Energy Economics, Ecological Economics and Environmental and Resource Economics between 2005 and 2011 is conducted. The dependent variable in the ordinary least squares regression model is the number of days between the submission of the paper and the acceptance of the paper, referred to as Time for Publication Acceptance, or TPA. The main results are that TPA is lower for CE papers than CV papers, especially for those that aim at improving the method which can be interpreted as a higher academic demand in the CE field. However, a convergence is observed over the years.
Keywords: meta-analysis; choice experiment; contingent valuation; time for publication acceptance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-07-17
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2014/Volume34/EB-14-V34-I3-P143.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-14-00186
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().