Video recordings in experiments â€“ Are there effects on self-selection or the outcome of the experiment?
Tim Lohse () and
Economics Bulletin, 2018, vol. 38, issue 3, 1381-1394
The use of video recordings in experimental economics has become increasingly popular. However, little attention is paid to how this might affect the composition of the participating subjects and the intended treatment effect. We make a first attempt to shed light on these issues and address them in an incentivized face-to-face tax compliance experiment. The experiment contains two dimensions; i) the level of the fine for non-compliance; and ii) the presence of a recording video camera. The 2x2 design frees the intended treatment effect of the fine from any effect resulting from the announced use of a camera. Our findings point in the direction that neither gender nor personality traits nor other individual characteristics seem to have the explanatory power to predict participation in sessions' with or without a camera, respectively. Most importantly, the presence of a recording video camera does not affect subjects' observed decision behavior in the actual experiment.
Keywords: Laboratory experiments; subject pools; convenience samples; video recordings; face-to-face interaction; tax compliance; cheating (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C9 H2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00033
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().