 How cost efficient is the eurosystem?Economics Bulletin, 2019, vol. 39, issue 1, 115-126 Abstract: The classical cost-saving argument for fiduciary media as suggested among others by Adam Smith and David Ricardo has been turned into an argument for an unbacked fiat money system by the early Milton Friedman. It holds that the production of commodity money, such as gold, is inefficient, as it ties up scarce resources in mining, minting, transportation and storage. These resources are diverted from more productive uses in other parts of the economy. Friedman estimated that the annual costs of a full-reserve gold standard would lie around 2.5% of GDP, which is arguably too high as he assumed full reserves on M2. Lawrence White later estimated the annual costs of a fractional-reserve gold standard to be 0.025% of GDP. Taking the latter estimate as a lower bound benchmark, it is shown in this case study that the annual operating expenses of the fiat standard of the euro area are in fact more than three times as high as White's estimate. But even when White's reserve ratio on M1 is substantially increased, the estimated costs of the gold standard and the actual operating expenses of the eurosystem remain in the same ballpark. Keywords: Central bank; eurosystem; operating expenses; fiat standard; gold standard (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00806 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.