A Choice of an Index under Inefficiency: Tornqvist or Fisher Index? Evidence from Simulation

Yongseung Han () and Myeong Hwan Kim ()
Additional contact information
Myeong Hwan Kim: Purdue University Fort Wayne

Economics Bulletin, 2021, vol. 41, issue 1, 41-47

Abstract: This study addresses a choice of quantity index when inefficiency exists. Performing simulations, we show that 1) the finding from the previous literature that the Fisher index and the Tornqvist index approximate each other is only a special case when inefficiency is negligible, 2) the Tornqvist index begins to deviate as inefficiency increases because the Tornqvist index uses the average cost shares as a weight in the calculation, and 3) the Tornqvist index eventually suffers from the Simpson's paradox, in which the average of two higher numbers are lower than the average of two lower numbers, when the factor substitutability is large. From these results, we conclude that the Fisher index is preferred to the Tornqvist index when any inefficient use of factors is suspected.

Keywords: Index Numbers; Fisher Index; Tornqvist Index; Allocative Inefficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C4 D2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-03-10
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2021/Volume0/EB-21-V41-I1-P4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-20-00026

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().