Measuring consumer surplus in the case of addiction: A re-examination of the rational benchmark algebra
Sophie Massin and
Maxence Miéra ()
Additional contact information
Maxence Miéra: Univ. Artois, LEM-CNRS (UMR 9221)
Economics Bulletin, 2020, vol. 40, issue 4, 3171-3181
Abstract:
Measuring consumer surplus for addicted consumers is challenging because the presence of internalities makes the observed demand schedule a biased basis to estimate the actual welfare experienced by consumers. A common practice in literature consists of using non-addicted consumers as a rational benchmark. This short contribution points out some limitations of existing approaches and provides a revised measure that satisfies desirable properties in this rational benchmark framework. Comparative estimates based on data from the Australian Productivity Commission 1999 report on gambling indicate that existing approaches lead to largely overestimate the net consumer surplus. The new measure we propose is easy to implement and could be a useful tool when it comes to assessing welfare in addictive contexts.
Keywords: Addiction; consumer surplus; cost-benefit analysis; rational benchmark; gambling (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D6 I1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-12-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2020/Volume40/EB-20-V40-I4-P278.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring consumer surplus in the case of addiction: A re-examination of the rational benchmark algebra (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-20-00728
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Economics Bulletin from AccessEcon
Bibliographic data for series maintained by John P. Conley ().