EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Innovative Activity over the Business Cycle

Paul Geroski and Chris Walters

Economic Journal, 1995, vol. 105, issue 431, 916-28

Abstract: This paper examines cyclical patterns of innovative activity in the United Kingdom over the period 1948-83. Innovative activity turns out to have many of the properties of a random walk but does show a tendency to cluster during booms. There is clear evidence of a long-term secular relation between the level of innovative activity and the level of economic activity, although this may have changed in the 1980s. Finally, the data provide no reason for thinking that these clusters of innovation cause cyclic variations in economic activity but variations in economic activity do Granger cause changes in innovative activity. Copyright 1995 by Royal Economic Society.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (157)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%2819950 ... 0.CO%3B2-B&origin=bc full text (application/pdf)
http://www.res.org.uk/datasets/vol105iss4.htm supporting dataset (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:431:p:916-28

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().

 
Page updated 2025-04-17
Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:105:y:1995:i:431:p:916-28