Sovereign risk, credibility and the gold standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31

Maurice Obstfeld and Alan Taylor

Economic Journal, 2003, vol. 113, issue 487, 241-275

Abstract: What determines sovereign risk? We study the London bond market from the 1870s to the 1930s. Our findings support conventional wisdom concerning the low credibility of the interwar gold standard. Before 1914 gold standard adherence effectively signalled credibility and shaved up to 30 basis points from country borrowing spreads. In the 1920s, however, simply resuming prewar gold parities was insufficient to secure benefits. Countries that devalued before resumption were treated more favourably, and markets scrutinised other signals. Public debt and British Empire membership were important determinants of spreads after World War One, but not before. Copyright 2003 Royal Economic Society.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (66)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31 (2003)
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31 (2003)
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31 (2003)
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31 (2003)
Working Paper: Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 versus 1925-31 (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:113:y:2003:i:487:p:241-275

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133

Access Statistics for this article

Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen

More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().