Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty
Emeric Henry
Economic Journal, 2009, vol. 119, issue 539, 1036-1064
Abstract:
In situations where a biased sender provides verifiable information to a receiver, I study how strategic reporting affects the incentives to search for information. Research provides series of signals that can be used selectively in reporting. I show that the sender is strictly worse off when his research effort is not observed by the receiver: he has to conduct more research than in the observable case and in equilibrium, discloses all the information he obtained. However this extra research can be socially beneficial and mandatory disclosure of results can thus be welfare reducing. Finally I identify cases where the sender withholds evidence and for which mandatory disclosure rules become more attractive. Copyright © The Author(s). Journal compilation © Royal Economic Society 2009.
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (65)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty (2009) 
Working Paper: Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:119:y:2009:i:539:p:1036-1064
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... al.asp?ref=0013-0133
Access Statistics for this article
Economic Journal is currently edited by Martin Cripps, Steve Machin, Woulter den Haan, Andrea Galeotti, Rachel Griffith and Frederic Vermeulen
More articles in Economic Journal from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().