Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
John List
Econometrica, 2004, vol. 72, issue 2, 615-625
Abstract:
Several experimental studies have provided evidence that suggest indifference curves have a kink around the current endowment level. These results, which clearly contradict closely held economic doctrines, have led some influential commentators to call for an entirely new economic paradigm to displace conventional neoclassical theory-e.g., prospect theory, which invokes psychological effects. This paper pits neoclassical theory against prospect theory by investigating data drawn from more than 375 subjects actively participating in a well-functioning marketplace. The pattern of results suggests that prospect theory adequately organizes behavior among inexperienced consumers, but consumers with intense market experience behave largely in accordance with neoclassical predictions. Moreover, the data are consistent with the notion that consumers learn to overcome the endowment effect in situations beyond specific problems they have previously encountered. This "transference of behavior" across domains has important implications in both a positive and normative sense. Copyright The Econometric Society 2004.
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (354)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00502.x link to full text (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Neoclassical theory versus prospect theory: Evidence from the marketplace (2004) 
Working Paper: Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace (2003) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:72:y:2004:i:2:p:615-625
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.economet ... ordering-back-issues
econometrica@econometricsociety.org
Access Statistics for this article
Econometrica is currently edited by Guido Imbens
More articles in Econometrica from Econometric Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery (contentdelivery@wiley.com).