EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Metacognition assessment - a literature review of specific instruments used to measure metacognitive awareness in adults

Claudia Irina Aldea
Additional contact information
Claudia Irina Aldea: University of Bucharest

Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 2024, vol. 11, issue 2, 330-339

Abstract: The assessment of metacognition has been a major research challenge over the years, especially because metacognition is a complex phenomenon encompassing both metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive skills and experiences. The assessment of metacognition is conducted in controlled settings, most commonly using a single scale-like instrument with clearly presented psychometric properties that measures a single dimension or several aspects of metacognition. Methodologically, the present research is an exploratory literature review, a systematization, which attempts to bring together researchers' concerns and findings on the effectiveness of self-report inventories in measuring metacognitive awareness. Over the past 30 years, 43 articles have been published using self-report inventories for adults suggesting that self-report provides a useful overview of two dimensions: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive skills. However, research highlights that metacognitive processes measured by self-report subscales are unclear: the two factors of metacognition are not adequately correlated with metacognitive behavior, but the subscales correlate strongly between self-report and metacognitive tasks.

Keywords: metacognition; metacognitive skills; self-report; teacher professional development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I20 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/sserr-11-2-330-339.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:330-339

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15258329

Access Statistics for this article

Social Sciences and Education Research Review is currently edited by Stefan Vladutescu

More articles in Social Sciences and Education Research Review from Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan Valeriu Voinea ().

 
Page updated 2025-05-10
Handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:11:y:2024:i:2:p:330-339