A PRACTICAL SECOND-ORDER DISCOURSE
Additional contact information
Ștefan Vlăduțescu: CCSCMOP, University of Craiova, Romania
Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 2019, vol. 6, issue 1, 146-155
This study is a reflection on the history of discourse and an emphasis on philosophy as a second-order practical discourse. On the one hand, meta-analytically is the idea that literature is canonical scriptural discourse: Literary discourse is a special creation in the report with the discourses from which it comes; as aesthetic discourse, literature has an inaugural character, it comes from many practical discourses. On the other hand, philosophy builds on the literary discourse. Philosophy has a strong, decisive modeling reinforcement; philosophy is a practice of streamlining the practice of everyday life. Philosophy builds up as a second-order practice (literature comes from life, from first-order practice, philosophy is founded as a special literary discourse and returns to life's practice, becoming a second-order discourse). Life has shaped literature, and literature has shaped philosophy.
Keywords: practice; literature; philosophy; seconde order discourse (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:6:y:2019:i:1:p:146-155
Access Statistics for this article
Social Sciences and Education Research Review is currently edited by Stefan Vladutescu
More articles in Social Sciences and Education Research Review from Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dan Valeriu Voinea ().