Parallelization of a non-linear multi-objective optimization algorithm: Application to a location problem

Aránzazu Gila Arrondo, Juana L. Redondo, José Fernández and Pilar M. Ortigosa

Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2015, vol. 255, issue C, 114-124

Abstract: Real-life problems usually include conflicting objectives. Solving multi-objective problems (i.e., obtaining the complete efficient set and the corresponding Pareto-front) via exact methods is in many cases nearly intractable. In order to cope with those problems, several (meta) heuristic procedures have been developed during the last decade whose aim is to obtain a good discrete approximation of the Pareto-front. In this vein, a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, called FEMOEA, which can be applied to many nonlinear multi-objective optimization problems, has recently been proposed. Through a comparison with an exact interval branch-and-bound algorithm, it has been shown that FEMOEA provides very good approximations of the Pareto-front. Furthermore, it has been compared to the reference algorithms NSGA-II, SPEA2 and MOEA/D. Comprehensive computational studies have shown that, among the studied algorithms, FEMOEA was the one providing, on average, the best results for all the quality indicators analyzed. However, when the set approximating the Pareto-front must have many points (because a high precision is required), the computational time needed by FEMOEA may not be negligible at all. Furthermore, the memory requirements needed by the algorithm when solving those instances may be so high that the available memory may not be enough. In those cases, parallelizing the algorithm and running it in a parallel architecture may be the best way forward. In this work, a parallelization of FEMOEA, called FEMOEA-Paral, is presented. To show its applicability, a bi-objective competitive facility location and design problem is solved. The results show that FEMOEA-Paral is able to maintain the effectiveness of the sequential version and this by reducing the computational costs. Furthermore, the parallel version shows good scalability. The efficiency results have been analyzed by means of a profiling and tracing toolkit for performance analysis.

Keywords: Nonlinear multi-objective optimization; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; Parallelism; Efficiency; Effectiveness; Tuning and Analysis Utilities Performance System; Facility location problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300314011308
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:255:y:2015:i:c:p:114-124

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.036

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Mathematics and Computation is currently edited by Theodore Simos

More articles in Applied Mathematics and Computation from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().