CO2–steam mixture for direct and indirect gasification of rice straw in a downdraft gasifier: Laboratory-scale experiments and performance prediction

Bayu Prabowo, Kentaro Umeki, Mi Yan, Masato R. Nakamura, Marco J. Castaldi and Kunio Yoshikawa

Applied Energy, 2014, vol. 113, issue C, 670-679

Abstract: This paper explored the feasibility of CO2 as alternative gasifying agent of steam to obtain higher thermal efficiency in biomass gasification. The effect of the gasifying agent on gas evolution and thermal efficiency was examined by using a lab scale downdraft gasifier. The results were also compared with the output of pyrolysis with N2. The reaction atmosphere in indirect and direct gasification was simulated by carrying out the experiments without and with O2 presence. The reaction conditions were varied in the temperature range from 750°C to 950°C by changing the CO2 molar fraction in gasifying agent to the ratio of 0, 30 and 60vol.% in balance with steam. 40vol.% of N2 fraction was kept during O2 free experiments, while 31.7vol.% of N2 and 8.3vol.% O2 were kept during the experiments with the presence of O2. At all examined condition, gasification yielded more combustible gas than pyrolysis. Furthermore, high CO2 fraction in gasifying agent generally resulted in low H2 yield and high CO yield. These substitutions mostly lowered the energy yield of the producer gas, but in the other hand also reduced the preheating energy of gasifying agent. Thus, optimizations of these changes were investigated for gaining highest thermal efficiency of the gasification process. Highest thermal efficiency of the process without O2 was 52% under N2 (40vol.%)–CO2 (60vol.%) atmosphere at the temperature of 850°C. For the process with O2, where the part of gasifying agent preheating energy supplied by the biomass partial combustion, the highest thermal efficiency was 60% under the CO2 (60vol.%)–O2 (8.3vol.%)–N2 (31.7vol.%) atmosphere at the temperature of 950°C. CO2 utilization as a gasifying agent potentially increases the thermal efficiency of biomass conversion process compared with pyrolysis or conventional indirect and direct gasification, i.e. pure-steam gasification and O2–steam gasification.

Keywords: Biomass gasification; CO2; Allothermal gasification; Indirect gasification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913006570
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:113:y:2014:i:c:p:670-679

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.022

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().