Evaluation of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs with multi-component transport and geomechanical effects

Tae Hong Kim, Jinhyung Cho and Kun Sang Lee

Applied Energy, 2017, vol. 190, issue C, 1195-1206

Abstract: Although research on CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs has been focused for enhanced gas recovery (EGR) and CO2 storage, previous studies have not examined both multi-component transport and geomechanical effects. Therefore, this study presents new shale gas models for CO2 injection considering multi-component adsorption, dissolution, molecular diffusion, and stress-dependent compaction. Based on these mechanisms and data for Barnett shale field, a simulation model was constructed for CO2 flooding and huff and puff. The proposed model was used to examine the effects of CO2 injection to EGR and CO2 storage and various mechanisms. The results presented that CO2 flooding and huff and puff improve CH4 production by 24% and 6% respectively compared with no injection scenario. At the end of simulated time, the injected CO2 is stored as free, adsorbed, and dissolved states in proportions of 42%, 55%, and 3% respectively. To confirm these results, Marcellus and New Albany shale models, which have different reservoir properties, are generated and compared with Barnett shale model. However, in Marcellus and New Albany shale models, effects of CO2 injection are lower than that of Barnett shale model. Therefore, to investigate factors affecting to the efficiency of CO2 injection in shale gas reservoirs, extensive simulations were performed. Results of the simulation analyses show that natural fracture permeability, hydraulic fracture half-length, well spacing, and Langmuir constants are significant factors for EGR and CO2 storage. For the real applications, these parameters should be mainly considered. The investigations performed in this study present better understanding of CO2 injection processes to EGR and CO2 storage and they are important for optimizing the designs of CO2 injection in field applications.

Keywords: Shale gas reservoir; Enhanced gas recovery; CO2 storage; Adsorption; Molecular diffusion; Geomechanics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261917300557
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:190:y:2017:i:c:p:1195-1206

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.047

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().