Technical, economic, and environmental assessment of liquid fuel production on aircraft carriers

Liam J.F. Comidy, Mark D. Staples and Steven R.H. Barrett

Applied Energy, 2019, vol. 256, issue C

Abstract: The supply chain to deliver fuels to aircraft carriers is complex, dangerous, and expensive, and one option to mitigate these risks is to produce fuel at sea. This work quantifies the costs, climate impacts, and physical characteristics of three technology pathways for fuel production onboard aircraft carriers: alkaline electrolysis and reverse water gas shift (AE + RWGS); solid oxide electrolysis and RWGS (SOEC + RWGS); and co-electrolysis of steam and CO2. Two design scenarios are evaluated: a small, infrequently operating plant using excess nuclear power (Scenario A); and a large, frequently operating plant with dedicated nuclear capacity (Scenario B). Fuel production costs are quantified using a Monte Carlo techno-economic analysis, ranging from 1.91 to 4.49 and 3.25–4.23 $/L in Scenarios A and B, respectively. The lowest cost technology pathway is AE + RWGS. All technology pathways are shown to offer reductions in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of 82–86% relative to petroleum JP-5. In Scenario B, the plant volume and weight are estimated at 50–67% and 432% of current aircraft carrier designs, respectively, highlighting challenges for technical feasibility. Furthermore, increasing plant production capacity and capacity factor is shown to reduce the unit cost of fuel production, but that this is largely offset by the additional costs of dedicated nuclear capacity required at larger scales. The results indicate that fuel production on an aircraft carrier may be technically feasible, cost competitive, and environmentally beneficial relative to the petroleum fuels currently in use. However, research to further reduce system cost, weight, and volume, including experimental validation, are still required.

Keywords: Power-to-Liquids; Electrofuels; JP-5; Fischer-Tropsch; Co-electrolysis; Techno-economic analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919314977
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:256:y:2019:i:c:s0306261919314977

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113810

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().