Electricity generation and demand flexibility in wastewater treatment plants: Benefits for 100% renewable electricity grids

Syed Muhammad Hassan Ali, Manfred Lenzen, Fabian Sack and Moslem Yousefzadeh

Applied Energy, 2020, vol. 268, issue C, No S0306261920304724

Abstract: In future, the low carbon electricity grid will need an additional potential of energetic flexibility to compensate the variable renewable supply. Wastewater treatment plants have the potential to provide electricity demand and generation flexibility. A novel approach of utilising the energetic flexibility in wastewater treatment plants to optimize the installed capacity of a fully renewable electricity grid in Australia is presented. In this hourly electricity supply simulation, both the electricity generation and demand of wastewater treatment plants are shifted for reducing the required size of 100% renewable electricity grid and achieving perfect supply-demand matching. The electricity demand and dispatchable electricity generation capacity of cogeneration systems in wastewater treatment plants are modelled on a 90×110 raster grid. For a 6-hour shift in wastewater treatment plant’s electricity demand and it’s electricity generation limited to five times the current capacity, a 100% renewable electricity grid would need an installed capacity of around 149 GW to meet the existing reliability standard (6–8 h of power outages per year). The electricity generation cost is around 16 ¢/kWh with a capacity factor of 28% and spilt electricity of less than 21%. The electricity generated from sewage methane in wastewater treatment plants is only 1% of the total generation and is utilised along with biomass power plants to plug demand-supply gaps. Our results indicate that a 2% reduction in installed capacity and 11% reduction in levelized cost of electricity is achieved by utilizing the energetic flexibility of wastewater treatment plants.

Keywords: 100% renewable power; Wastewater treatment plant; Load-shifting; Electricity supply simulation; Energetic flexibility; Co-generation systems (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920304724
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:268:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920304724

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114960

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().