 Sensitivity analysis of Double Transmission Double Expansion (DTDE) systems for assessment of the environmental impact of recovering energy waste in exhaust air from compressed air systemsJ.S. Leszczynski and D. Grybos Applied Energy, 2020, vol. 278, issue C, No S0306261920311880 Abstract: This paper focuses on energy savings from compressed air that is removed (expanded) through muffles into the ambient environment. We present a novel analysis of the Double Transmission Double Expansion (DTDE) approach as part of thermodynamic cycles, a new collector system and a significant improvement in the internal construction of our Energy Harvester Unit (EHU). It means necessary research tests that will improve the environmental impact of any pneumatic machine operating on an industrial scale, and will also guarantee that the introduction of back pressure will not interfere with the normal operation of the machine. In this way, we are able to compensate for the over-scaling of the pneumatic machine. Analysis of DTDE thermodynamic cycles reveals a decrease in gauge pressure in dead volumes, which reduces ”dead work” in the operating cylinders within the associated devices. To connect our EHU with an operating machine, we need to develop a collector system. Such system is an intermediate installation that automatically starts the pressure level in the back pB to an acceptable level when the pneumatic machine operates in the same way as mentioned earlier. Thus, the waste of power pBV̇B is constant, so the volumetric flow V̇B should also work automatically. In this way we can adapt any operating condition of the exhaust part of the pneumatic machine to the necessary condition required by the EHU. Finally, the DTDE approach has been assessed using two environmental factors that analyse electricity consumption and decrease the operation time of the compressor. To prove this concept, industrial tests on a small scale have been carried out. We are also changing the internal construction of the EHU by introducing a slide-crank mechanism instead of the gear system (gear wheel rack) used previously. This modification ensures a significant improvement in electricity savings achieved, from 4% to 11%. Short calculations of annual cost savings (ACS) for the DTDE indicate savings of about 1/3 of the compressor’s operating costs. It brings more benefits in terms of practical solutions for energy management systems. According to the results, we are able to propose and analyse Closed Cycle (CC) and Exhaust Air Re-circulation (EAR) methods that manage the air power which exits through the machine outputs, i.e. mufflers. We were surprised by the amount of annual cost savings (ACS) for the new CC and EAR concepts compared to DTDE. However, we want to emphasise that CC and EAR calculations did not take into account losses due to leakages, friction along the length of the pipeline, as well as the low efficiency of the booster. Therefore, in practice, the real savings of the CC and EAR concepts are unknown and are still waiting for confirmation. Keywords: Energy efficiency; Thermodynamic analysis; Exhaust air energy; Power and energy savings; Compressed air energy storage; Hybrid pneumatic power system (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:278:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920311880 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115696 Access Statistics for this article Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.