Light robust co-optimization of energy and reserves in the day-ahead electricity market

Lina Silva-Rodriguez, Anibal Sanjab, Elena Fumagalli and Madeleine Gibescu

Applied Energy, 2024, vol. 353, issue PA, No S0306261923013466

Abstract: To accommodate the stochasticity of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) while efficiently dispatching generation resources and procuring adequate reserves, previous research proposed co-optimizing energy and reserves in the day-ahead (DA) using various uncertainty-based mechanisms. However, the co-optimized markets based on these mechanisms exhibit implementation limitations related to their high computational burden, complex customized solution algorithms, and over-conservative solutions. To address these shortcomings, this paper proposes a practical light robust optimization (LR) approach for the DA co-optimization of energy and reserves. The method results in a linear market clearing mechanism that easily enables the control of the robustness level of the solution through a tunable conservativeness parameter. In addition, the paper explores three different formulations for specifying the system reserve requirements considering, namely, fixed reserve requirements (LRF1), variable reserve requirements based on system uncertainty (LRF2), and a combined approach (LRF3). The formulations integrate the uncertainty from VRES in the market setting using a new bid format called uncertainty bid. The three formulations are then compared using a case study. The numerical results show the effects of the variation of the conservativeness parameter and the reserve requirements on the total socio-economic welfare (SEW), dispatched energy quantities, anticipated activation costs, and procured reserves. Moreover, the analyses showcase that sizing reserves based on system uncertainty (in LRF2) results in a 27%–61% decrease in reserve procurement costs when compared with LRF1, while the combined approach (in LRF3) results in a better performance than LRF2 in terms of reserve activation costs, with costs 61%–263% lower than in LRF2.

Keywords: Short-term electricity markets; Light robust optimization; Renewable energy integration; Uncertainty-based market clearing; Reserves procurement and activation; Joint market clearing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923013466
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:353:y:2024:i:pa:s0306261923013466

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121982

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().