Method for evaluating fairness of electricity tariffs with regard to income level of residential buildings

Hannah Covington, Brian Woo-Shem, Chenli Wang, Thomas Roth, Cuong Nguyen, Yuhong Liu, Yi Fang and Hohyun Lee

Applied Energy, 2024, vol. 353, issue PB, No S0306261923014940

Abstract: Modern advancements in energy technology, such as smart meters and renewable power generation, have contributed to the increasing penetration of time-variable electricity pricing plans. Under such plans, consumers experience a higher financial burden for consuming electricity when overall demand is high. Lower-income households may be disproportionately burdened by the transition to time-variable pricing because they tend to have less efficient homes and appliances, which may necessitate greater overall electricity consumption, especially during peak times. The goal of this work is to create a broadly applicable framework for evaluating the fairness of utility pricing plans. The proposed slope analysis method examines the distribution of a fairness metric across income levels in order to determine the level of fairness exhibited by a pricing plan. This work utilizes three fairness metrics, which are based on total household electricity bill and income, as a proof-of-concept for the slope analysis method and assesses their viability for fairness research. The proposed method also utilizes household energy models to represent various income levels for any location with sufficient data. The framework is evaluated using simulated households across 5 income levels and 3 climate zones in the United States. Fairness metrics are applied to the utility bills calculated under Real-Time Pricing and existing tariffs offered at each location. The proposed fairness evaluation method provides a quantitative measure of fairness and is broadly applicable across location and pricing plans. The metric based on the change in percentage of income spent on utilities considers the relative financial burden on households, which results in the slope analysis method outputting conclusive, accurate fairness determinations more often than the other examined metrics. The results demonstrate disparity in energy affordability, and the proposed slope analysis and model simulation methods provide a readily transferable testbed to evaluate energy policy equity.

Keywords: EnergyPlus; High-level architecture; Energy insecurity; Stochastic model generation; Equity; Co-simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261923014940
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:353:y:2024:i:pb:s0306261923014940

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122130

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().