Integrated sustainability assessment of repurposing onshore abandoned wells for geothermal power generation

Jingyi Li, Alejandro Gallego-Schmid and Laurence Stamford

Applied Energy, 2024, vol. 359, issue C, No S0306261924000539

Abstract: As global efforts intensify to mitigate climate change through Net-Zero by 2050, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is of utmost importance. Within this context, geothermal power generation is an underestimated yet rapidly developing field with immense potential. A notable opportunity arises from repurposing abandoned oil and gas wells (AOGWs) as alternative sources for geothermal power production. This study employs multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to examine the techno-sustainability of four geothermal power systems: i) a business-as-usual geothermal power plant (GEObau), ii) repurpose two completely AOGWs for geothermal power generation (R-GEOdouble), iii) repurpose a single completely AOGW (R-GEOsingle), iv) repurpose semi-AOGWs (i.e., wells still in operation but with high water cut, R-GEOsemi). We assessed 30 criteria across technical, environmental, economic, and social dimensions via the analytical hierarchy process. The study identifies R-GEOsemi as the most techno-sustainable option due to its superior performance across environmental, economic, and social dimensions. However, GEObau closely follows R-GEOsemi, securing its position as the second-best option, marked by its outstanding technical proficiency and robust environmental and social performance. Conversely, R-GEOdouble and R-GEOsingle show limited techno-sustainability competitiveness. When sensitivity analyses are applied to the weighting factors, R-GEOsemi demonstrates resilience and remains as the best option in most cases. However, GEObau could outperform R-GEOsemi when the value of technical criteria is increased (weightings >0.255) or when the weightings for environmental or economic aspects decrease (weightings <0.236 and < 0.244 respectively). R-GEOdouble and R-GEOsingle only overtake GEObau when the economic aspect reaches a weighting of 0.659 or more. Despite R-GEOsemi being the most promising option, it faces challenges due to limited power generation capacity and the availability of wells approaching their end-of-lives. The findings underline the necessity for broader stakeholder input, inclusion of more technical and social criteria, and data-driven decision-making processes.

Keywords: Life cycle techno-sustainability assessment; Renewable electricity; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Energy transition; Geothermal energy; Circular economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924000539
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:359:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924000539

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122670

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().