Techno-economic modeling of carbon dioxide hydrate formation for carbon sequestration

Awan Bhati, Mark Hamalian and Vaibhav Bahadur

Applied Energy, 2025, vol. 377, issue PB, No S0306261924018749

Abstract: Significant carbon sequestration capacity (up to 10 Gigatons/yr) will be needed by 2050 to limit the Earth's temperature rise to <1.5 °C. Current worldwide sequestration capacity is only ∼40MT/yr, which highlights the need for the development of new and scalable sequestration approaches. One promising approach for long-term sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) is the deposition of CO2 hydrates (ice-like solids of water and CO2) on the seabed with artificial sealing (or under marine sediments). Technologically, this involves formation of CO2 hydrate foam, transport of the foam to the sequestration site, compaction into hydrate plugs, sealing and then disposal. Critical to the techno-economic success of this concept is the ability to rapidly form hydrates. The present group has achieved very high rates of formation of hydrate foam by bubbling CO2 gas at high flow rates in a bubble column reactor (BCR). This study utilizes recent experimental results on ultra-fast hydrate formation to conduct a detailed techno-economic analysis of the hydrate foam-making process. All analysis is conducted for a 1 Megaton/yr sequestration project with project life of 30 years. Our analysis shows that the energy requirements (assumed as electrical in this study) for hydrate formation equal 260 kWhr/ton and the total cost of hydrate foam production is $36/ton. The biggest cost component is energy, which accounts for 51 % of total cost. A 1 Megaton/yr project will require an initial capital investment of $150 M. Such a project will consume 0.66 million cubic meters of seawater/yr. Contributions of various key processes to the total cost are quantified. Process-wise, the biggest contributors to total cost are refrigeration and gas compression, which account for 41 % and 27 % of the total cost, respectively. Cost of the BCR is only 0.1 % of the total investment cost. Also, gas recirculation in the BCR contributes minimally (0.14 %) to the overall energy requirement. Finally, this study identifies pathways to reduce $/ton costs to increase the viability of this carbon sequestration approach. It is noted that hydrate transportation, compaction and sealing are not included in this analysis which focuses on the techno-economics of rapid hydrate formation only.

Keywords: CO2 hydrates; Carbon sequestration; Bubble column reactor; Techno-economic modeling; Hydrate foam (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924018749
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:377:y:2025:i:pb:s0306261924018749

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124491

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().