Exploring climate-driven performance of floating photovoltaic systems: Energy production enhancement and evaporation reduction

Rodrigo Cáceres González, Cristóbal Sarmiento-Laurel, Hernán Alcayaga, Andrés J. Díaz, Alonso Pizarro, Juan Crespo Fuentes, Alicia Moya Caro, Camila Vásquez Páez, Fabián Bustos Olavarría, Roberta Boscolo and Hamid Bastani

Applied Energy, 2025, vol. 386, issue C, No S0306261925002867

Abstract: This study evaluates four floating photovoltaic (FPV) system configurations across 4,244 water bodies in diverse climates: semi-arid, desert, Marine West Coast, Mediterranean, and tundra, considering variations such as dry summers or winters, coastal influence, and mountain influence. The Penman–Monteith model is chosen to predict evaporation due to its low Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Mean Square Error (MSE). Results indicate that the greatest water savings occur in cold desert climates with dry winters (BWk(w)), achieving reductions of up to 2066.15 mm per year. Significant water-energy synergies are observed in Type-A and Type-D configurations, where the support system fully covers the water under the FPV, leading to improvements in energy production, with a median reaching up to 8187.65 Wh/m2/year and a median evaporation saving of 1085.24 mm/year for the Type-A configuration in the BSk(w) climate. Tundra climates (ET) generally show less evaporation, but dry winters (ET(w)) and summers (ET(s)) enhance performance. ET(w) achieves a median energy production increase of 6430.7 Wh/m2/year and a median evaporation saving of 1165.20 mm/year, while ET(s) follows closely with 5997.42 Wh/m2/year and 794.06 mm/year in savings. The module temperature reduction (ΔT) is crucial for FPV performance. Higher ΔT, such as 7.60 °C in BSk(w), boosts energy production and evaporation savings, increasing panel efficiency by up to 1.45%. Conversely, lower ΔT climates, like Cfc at 4.26°C, exhibit reduced efficiency. This paper provides a comprehensive characterization of FPV system performance across a wide range of climates, demonstrating their potential to enhance energy production and reduce water loss.

Keywords: Floating photovoltaic systems (FPV); Water-energy synergies; Water conservation; Evaporation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925002867
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:386:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925002867

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125556

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().