Optimizing hybrid energy systems for remote Australian communities: The role of tilt angle in cost-effective green hydrogen production
Tushar Kanti Roy,
Sajeeb Saha and
Amanullah Maung Than Oo
Applied Energy, 2025, vol. 391, issue C, No S0306261925006518
Abstract:
This study investigates hybrid energy systems (HESs) integrating photovoltaic (PV) panels, batteries, fuel cells (FCs), electrolyzers (ELs), and hydrogen tanks (HTs) to address the energy needs of remote Australian communities. Two configurations are analyzed: Type-A (PV/Batt/FC/EL/HT) and Type-B (PV/FC/EL/HT), focusing on cost-efficiency, energy reliability, and hydrogen production. Several optimization techniques, including the cuckoo search algorithm, non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II), and sequential quadratic programming algorithm (SQPA), flower pollination algorithm, constrained PSO, and harmony search algorithm, are employed to determine optimal system configurations. Type-A emerges as the most cost-effective configuration when optimized with NSGA-II, achieving a net present cost (NPC) of $226,500, a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of $0.193/kWh, and a levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) of $4.88/kg. Battery integration in Type-A enhances both cost-efficiency and energy reliability. For hydrogen-focused applications, SQPA yields the highest hydrogen production at 4737 kg/year, supported by higher EL (14 kW) and FC (18.63 kW) capacities. System efficiency is found to be highly sensitive to PV tilt angle, with 30∘ identified as optimal. Increasing the tilt to 70∘ can raise system costs by up to 75 %. Sensitivity analyses reveal that improving component efficiencies dramatically impacts costs. For example, increasing fuel cell efficiency from 40 % to 60 % reduces NPC, LCOE, and LCOH by $40,000, $0.04/kWh, and $0.1/kg, respectively, especially in Type-A systems. Collectively, adjustments to PV tilt angles and component efficiencies can reduce overall costs by up to 40 %. These insights offer a strategic foundation for designing HESs that balance electricity and hydrogen generation, tailored for sustainable operation in off-grid and remote settings.
Keywords: Energy storage optimization; Electrolyzers and hydrogen storage system; Hybrid renewable energy integration; Hybrid energy system; Levelized cost metrics (LCOE, LCOH); Metaheuristic optimization algorithms; Remote energy solutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925006518
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:391:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925006518
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125921
Access Statistics for this article
Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan
More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().