EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Optimized monthly-fixed thermostat-setting scheme for maximum energy-savings and thermal comfort in air-conditioned spaces

Sami A. Al-Sanea and M.F. Zedan

Applied Energy, 2008, vol. 85, issue 5, 326-346

Abstract: The present study deals with energy conservation in buildings via reduction of cooling-and-heating transmission loads through walls by optimizing the indoor air-temperature settings. Maximum energy-saving and thermal-comfort are obtained for both yearly- and monthly-fixed thermostat settings. The transmission loads are calculated under the climatic conditions of Riyadh by using a dynamic heat-transfer model based on the finite-volume implicit procedure, which has been validated previously. The study utilizes a basic thermal-comfort chart where indoor air temperatures are selected inside the summer and winter comfort-zones, as a function of relative humidity, in a manner to provide the highest comfort-level while maximizing energy savings. The yearly-fixed thermostat settings range between 21.6 °C and 24.1 °C (70.9 °F and 75.4 °F), and those for the optimized monthly-fixed settings range between 20.1 °C and 26.2 °C (68.2 °F and 79.1 °F). For the yearly-fixed thermostat settings, the results show that about a 10% reduction in yearly cooling transmission load can be achieved per 1 °C increase in thermostat setting. Despite a corresponding increase of about 14% in yearly heating transmission load, a net saving in the yearly total energy cost of about 4% can still be affected per 1 °C increase in thermostat setting within the comfort zone. However, much bigger savings are achieved by utilizing an optimized monthly-fixed thermostat setting scheme developed in this study. Savings in energy cost between 26.8% and 33.6% compared with the yearly-fixed settings are obtained depending on the value of yearly-fixed setting. The corresponding reductions in peak loads compared with the yearly-fixed settings range between 13.5% and 25.6% in summer, and between 15.1% and 31.9% in winter depending on the yearly-fixed setting. These percentage savings in energy cost and reductions in peak loads are conservative since the yearly-fixed settings are themselves selected for high annual energy-savings while maintaining a high level of thermal comfort throughout the year.

Keywords: Thermostat; settings; Energy; conservation; Thermal; comfort; Heat; transmission (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306-2619(07)00120-1
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:85:y:2008:i:5:p:326-346

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:85:y:2008:i:5:p:326-346