EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Potential benefits of solar reflective car shells: Cooler cabins, fuel savings and emission reductions

Ronnen Levinson, Heng Pan, George Ban-Weiss, Pablo Rosado, Riccardo Paolini and Hashem Akbari

Applied Energy, 2011, vol. 88, issue 12, 4343-4357

Abstract: Vehicle thermal loads and air conditioning ancillary loads are strongly influenced by the absorption of solar energy. The adoption of solar reflective coatings for opaque surfaces of the vehicle shell can decrease the “soak” temperature of the air in the cabin of a vehicle parked in the sun, potentially reducing the vehicle’s ancillary load and improving its fuel economy by permitting the use of a smaller air conditioner. An experimental comparison of otherwise identical black and silver compact sedans indicated that increasing the solar reflectance (ρ) of the car’s shell by about 0.5 lowered the soak temperature of breath-level air by about 5–6°C. Thermal analysis predicts that the air conditioning capacity required to cool the cabin air in the silver car to 25°C within 30min is 13% less than that required in the black car. Assuming that potential reductions in AC capacity and engine ancillary load scale linearly with increase in shell solar reflectance, ADVISOR simulations of the SC03 driving cycle indicate that substituting a typical cool-colored shell (ρ=0.35) for a black shell (ρ=0.05) would reduce fuel consumption by 0.12L per 100km (1.1%), increasing fuel economy by 0.10kmL−1 [0.24mpg] (1.1%). It would also decrease carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2.7gkm−1 (1.1%), nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions by 5.4mgkm−1 (0.44%), carbon monoxide (CO) emissions by 17mgkm−1 (0.43%), and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions by 4.1mgkm−1 (0.37%). Selecting a typical white or silver shell (ρ=0.60) instead of a black shell would lower fuel consumption by 0.21L per 100km (1.9%), raising fuel economy by 0.19kmL−1 [0.44mpg] (2.0%). It would also decrease CO2 emissions by 4.9gkm−1 (1.9%), NOx emissions by 9.9mgkm−1 (0.80%), CO emissions by 31mgkm−1 (0.79%), and HC emissions by 7.4mgkm−1 (0.67%). Our simulations may underestimate emission reductions because emissions in standardized driving cycles are typically lower than those in real-world driving.

Keywords: Cool colored car; Solar reflective shell; Vehicle air conditioning; Vehicle fuel economy; Vehicle emission reduction; ADVISOR (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261911002972
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:12:p:4343-4357

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/bibliographic
http://www.elsevier. ... 405891/bibliographic

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.05.006

Access Statistics for this article

Applied Energy is currently edited by J. Yan

More articles in Applied Energy from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:88:y:2011:i:12:p:4343-4357