Academic spin doctoring: The incommensurability debate as a scholarly war fantasy

Sid Lowe and Michel Rod

Australasian marketing journal, 2018, vol. 26, issue 4, 307-309

Abstract: This commentary to Shaw and Nowicki (2018) proposes that academic paradigms are ‘dialogical’ discourses that both compete and collaborate in order to sustain their identities. They are all based on different underlying assumptions and are carried by different symbols, tropes and narratives. Each version of the truth cultivates an identity that principally depends upon it not being its alternative. As a result, each paradigm depends upon the continued existence of its opposite. In this sense, therefore, the paradigm wars were a concocted dispute over invented territories and contrived opponents. The contribution of the paper for those seeking paradigmatic peace is to emphasise that just as the war was a concocted 'simulacrum', any peace must also be designed as fantasies accomplished through language games.

Keywords: Paradigm wars; Incommensurability; Language games; Metaphor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358218302672
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:26:y:2018:i:4:p:307-309

DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.10.004

Access Statistics for this article

Australasian marketing journal is currently edited by Roger Marshall

More articles in Australasian marketing journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().