 Calibrating and aggregating multi-dimensional concepts with fuzzy sets: “Human Development” and the quality of democracyDirk Berg-Schlosser Australasian marketing journal, 2018, vol. 26, issue 4, 350-357 Abstract: In the social sciences we often employ complex multi-dimensional concepts such as development, democracy or marketplace. In the past decades, these have become increasingly operationalized and documented in huge international databases such as those of the United Nations, the World Bank, and a host of other public or academic institutions. Serious problems arise when these data are taken at face value, as for example GDP per capita, without considering its specific context and meaning, or when multi-dimensional concepts are aggregated into single indices by such simple statistical procedures as arithmetic means. The validity of such concepts is then seriously put into question by misleading measurement or oversimplifying aggregation. The increasing use of set-theoretical methods, as in fuzzy-set QCA, now provides an important alternative by calibrating data more carefully and by aggregation procedures which allow to take necessary conditions of a multi-dimensional concept into account. This is the focus of this paper, which employs two examples of a broad, political-practical, relevance. Keywords: Development; Democracy; Complex concepts (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:26:y:2018:i:4:p:350-357 DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.10.008 Access Statistics for this article Australasian marketing journal is currently edited by Roger Marshall More articles in Australasian marketing journal from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.