EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Response to Thoemmes and Lemmer (2019) regarding mediation analysis revisited

Jungkeun Kim, (Gina) Cui, Yuanyuan, Sungha Jang, Mark T. Spence and Jongwon Park

Australasian marketing journal, 2019, vol. 27, issue 2, 126-128

Abstract: Kim et al. (2018) raised four issues along with possible remedies that could affect statistical conclusions from mediation analysis. The issues addressed were: omitted mediators, reverse mediation, multi-item measures, and experimental methods. This prompted an insightful response from Thoemmes and Lemmer (2019), who largely agreed upon and further developed three of the issues. But there was disagreement concerning the appropriateness of conducting reverse mediation, their argument being the likelihood of returning equivalent models. Here, it is acknowledged that mediation analysis should be theory-driven and not conducted just to see which model is better. Further, in some contexts such as mediation analysis based on survey data the benefits of conducting reverse mediation are likely to be minimal. However, it is not uncommon to measure the mediator after having measured dependent variables, particularly in experimental settings. Hence, it is argued here to check for artificial mediation by reversing the arrows. A simulation is conducted to support this argument.

Keywords: mediation analysis; reverse mediation; mediator; measurement order (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358219300424
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:27:y:2019:i:2:p:126-128

DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.02.003

Access Statistics for this article

Australasian marketing journal is currently edited by Roger Marshall

More articles in Australasian marketing journal from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:27:y:2019:i:2:p:126-128