EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Competition of punishment and reward among inequity-averse individuals in spatial public goods games

Xianjia Wang, Rui Ding, Jinhua Zhao, Wenman Chen and Cuiling Gu

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2022, vol. 156, issue C

Abstract: Punishment has traditionally been considered a more effective mechanism to promote cooperation than reward, but this is not necessarily the case if they are driven by inequity aversion (IA). A complete sense of fairness includes first-order and second-order IAs which refer to protests against advantageous and disadvantageous inequity, respectively. In this paper, such protests refer to the punishment and reward in payoff. To study the effect of IAs on human cooperation, we model a four-strategy system in spatial public goods game (PGG) with cooperators (Cs), first-order and second-order inequity-averse individuals (FIAs and SIAs), as well as defectors (Ds). The phase diagrams of the system illustrate that the presence of IAs can improve the cooperation level of population, and the effectiveness of different types of IAs are affected by several factors. Through the exploration of some phases and phase transitions, we conclude that a higher r (synergy factor) improves the competitiveness of SIAs more than that of FIAs, while a higher α (the factor of punishment and reward costs) undermines the cooperation promoting effect of FIAs more than that of SIAs. Such results are mainly related to the different spread patterns of their clusters. Unexpectedly, the increase of β (the factor of punishment and reward intensity) sometimes has a positive effect on the spread of defectors, which is attributed to the emergence of the self-organizing cyclic state among Cs, SIAs and Ds. Furthermore, indirect territorial competition can be observed for a high r, where Cs, FIAs and SIAs compete separately with Ds, and SIAs are more competitive than FIAs as a result.

Keywords: Cooperation; Inequity aversion; Spatial public goods game; Punishment and reward; Evolutionary game theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096007792200073X
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s096007792200073x

DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111862

Access Statistics for this article

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals is currently edited by Stefano Boccaletti and Stelios Bekiros

More articles in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thayer, Thomas R. ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s096007792200073x