“Phase transitions” in small systems: Why standard threshold definitions fail for nanolasers

G.L. Lippi, T. Wang and G.P. Puccioni

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2022, vol. 157, issue C

Abstract: Since the development of micro- and nanolasers, the question of laser threshold has been subject to debate. Different definitions have been used to try and establish its occurrence, often encountering major obstacles. We examine a set of common physical definitions which we apply to measurements taken in a micro-VCSEL. Their predictions not only clearly disagree, pointing to different pump values at which the laser should cross threshold, but they also correspond to autocorrelation values which demonstrate very low field coherence. A topological analysis of the rate equations, with average spontaneous emission added to the lasing mode, clearly identifies the contradictions and explains the origin of the discrepancies. Additional considerations help understanding the failure of the approach and highlight the path towards a unique and general definition of threshold in all lasers, irrespective of their sizes. A critical scrutiny of the assumptions made in the rate equations with spontaneous emission illustrates their strength and weaknesses and better defines the bounds within which their predictions hold. We remark in the conclusions how the main results of this paper could hold for other small systems.

Keywords: Micro-/nanolasers; Laser threshold; Phase transition; Topological analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077922000613
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s0960077922000613

DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111850

Access Statistics for this article

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals is currently edited by Stefano Boccaletti and Stelios Bekiros

More articles in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thayer, Thomas R. ().