EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Threshold random walks in the US stock market

Zisimos Koustas, Jean-François Lamarche and Apostolos Serletis

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2008, vol. 37, issue 1, 43-48

Abstract: This paper extends the work in Serletis and Shintani [Serletis A, Shintani M. No evidence of chaos but some evidence of dependence in the US stock market. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2003;17:449–54.] and Elder and Serletis [Elder J, Serletis A. On fractional integrating dynamics in the US stock market. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, forthcoming.] by re-examining the empirical evidence for random walk type behavior in the US stock market. In doing so, it tests the random walk hypothesis by employing unit root tests that are designed to have more statistical power against non-linear alternatives. The non-linear feature of our model is reflected by three regimes, one of which is characterized by a unit root process and the random walk hypothesis while the lower and upper regimes are well captured by a stationary autoregressive process with mean reversion and predictability.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077906010794
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
Working Paper: Threshold Random Walks in the U.S. Stock Market (2006) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:37:y:2008:i:1:p:43-48

DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.11.024

Access Statistics for this article

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals is currently edited by Stefano Boccaletti and Stelios Bekiros

More articles in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thayer, Thomas R. ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:37:y:2008:i:1:p:43-48