EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

From criticality to final collapse: Evolution of the “b-value” from 1.5 to 1.0

Alberto Carpinteri, Giuseppe Lacidogna and Simone Puzzi

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2009, vol. 41, issue 2, 843-853

Abstract: Extensive research and studies on concrete fracture and failure by means of the acoustic emission (AE) technique have shown that fracture and damage growth can be characterized through a single synthetic parameter, namely the b-value, which changes systematically during the different stages of the failure process, as shown by several AE tests carried out from the specimen to the structural scale [Sammonds PR, Meredith PG, Murrel SAF, Main IG. Modelling the damage evolution in rock containing porefluid by acoustic emission. In: Proceedings of the Eurock’94; 1994; Colombo S, Main IG, Forde MC. Assessing damage of reinforced concrete beam using “b-value” analysis of acoustic emission signals. J Mater Civil Eng ASCE 2003;15:280–6; Carpinteri A, Lacidogna G, Niccolini G. Critical behaviour in concrete structures and damage localisation by Acoustic Emission. Key Eng Mater 2006;312:305–10]. This parameter can be linked to the value of the exponent α of the power-law distribution of the crack size in a damaged structure. In this paper, we propose a statistical interpretation for the variation of the b-value during the evolution of damage, based on a treatment originally proposed by [Carpinteri A. Mechanical damage and crack growth in concrete: plastic collapse to brittle fracture. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1986; Carpinteri A. Decrease of apparent tensile and bending strength with specimen size: two different explanations based on fracture mechanics. Int J Solid Struct 1989;25:407–29; Carpinteri A. Scaling laws and renormalization groups for strength and toughness of disordered materials. Int J Solid Struct 1994;31:291–302]. The proposed model captures the transition from the condition of criticality, in which α=3, to that of imminent failure, characterized by α=2, in terms of damage localisation.

Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960077908001689
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:41:y:2009:i:2:p:843-853

DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2008.04.010

Access Statistics for this article

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals is currently edited by Stefano Boccaletti and Stelios Bekiros

More articles in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thayer, Thomas R. ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:eee:chsofr:v:41:y:2009:i:2:p:843-853