Insurance coverage and agency problems in doctor prescriptions: Evidence from a field experiment in China
Journal of Development Economics, 2014, vol. 106, issue C, 156-167
This study examines doctors' prescribing decisions using controlled hospital visits with randomized patient insurance and doctor incentive status. The results suggest that, when they expect to obtain a proportion of patients' drug expenditures, doctors write 43% more expensive prescriptions to insured patients than to uninsured patients. These differences are largely explained by an agency hypothesis that doctors act out of self-interest by prescribing unnecessary or excessively expensive drugs to insured patients, rather than by a considerate doctor hypothesis that doctors take account of the tradeoff between drug efficacy and patients' ability to pay.
Keywords: Health insurance; Agency problems; Incentive; Drug prescription; Field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D82 I11 I18 L15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:deveco:v:106:y:2014:i:c:p:156-167
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Economics is currently edited by M. R. Rosenzweig
More articles in Journal of Development Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Haili He ().