The myth of post-reform income stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico
Irineu de Carvalho Filho () and
Marcos Chamon ()
Journal of Development Economics, 2012, vol. 97, issue 2, 368-386
Economic policies are often judged by a handful of statistics, some of which may be biased during periods of change. We estimate the income growth implied by the evolution of food demand and durable good ownership in post-reform Brazil and Mexico, and find that changes in consumption patterns are inconsistent with official estimates of near stagnant incomes. That is attributed to biases in the price deflator. The estimated unmeasured income gains are higher for poorer households, implying marked reductions in “real” inequality. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that post-reform income growth was low and did not benefit the poor.
Keywords: Household consumption; Measurement error; CPI bias; Economic reform; Trade liberalization; Inflation stabilization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 E01 I32 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
Working Paper: The myth of post-reform income stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico (2011)
Working Paper: The Myth of Post-Reform Income Stagnation; Evidence from Brazil and Mexico (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:deveco:v:97:y:2012:i:2:p:368-386
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Economics is currently edited by M. R. Rosenzweig
More articles in Journal of Development Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().