The myth of post-reform income stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico

Irineu de Carvalho Filho and Marcos Chamon ()

MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany

Abstract: Economic policies are often judged by a handful of statistics, some of which may be biased during periods of change. We estimate the income growth implied by the evolution of food demand and durable good ownership in post-reform Brazil and Mexico, and find that changes in consumption patterns are inconsistent with official estimates of near stagnant incomes. That is attributed to biases in the price deflator. The estimated unmeasured income gains are higher for poorer households, implying marked reductions in “real” inequality. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom that post-reform income growth was low and did not benefit the poor.

Keywords: Household consumption; Measurement Error; CPI Bias; Economic reform; Trade liberalization; Inflation stabilization. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D12 E01 I32 O10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/28532/1/MPRA_paper_28532.pdf original version (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The myth of post-reform income stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico (2012)
Working Paper: The Myth of Post-Reform Income Stagnation: Evidence from Brazil and Mexico (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:28532

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MPRA Paper from University Library of Munich, Germany Ludwigstraße 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joachim Winter ().