 Environmental policies and political feasibility: Eco-labels versus emission taxesJason Walter and Yang-Ming Chang Economic Analysis and Policy, 2020, vol. 66, issue C, 194-206 Abstract: This paper examines the economic and political implications of two market-based policies, eco-certifications and emission taxes. We evaluate each policy’s effects on the environment, investment in clean technology, and social welfare under imperfect competition. We find that eco-certification reduces total damage to the environment, increases consumer benefits, and is socially desirable. However, polluting firms will never voluntarily accept the socially optimal eco-standard, leading to suboptimal certification programs. Unless the marginal damage to the environment from emissions is sufficiently low and demand is sufficiently large, environmental damage occurring under voluntary eco-certification is higher in comparison to alternative policies. We examine the welfare impacts of each policy to identify social preferences. Using realized market benefits to construct policy preferences, we show conditions under which the socially optimal environmental policy is unlikely to be politically feasible. Our results explain the popularity and suboptimal qualities of eco-certification programs. Keywords: Eco-certification; Emission taxes; Environmental regulations; Green consumers (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecanpo:v:66:y:2020:i:c:p:194-206 DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2020.04.004 Access Statistics for this article Economic Analysis and Policy is currently edited by Clevo Wilson More articles in Economic Analysis and Policy from Elsevier |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.